Change is always
difficult.
It can be amusing to look
back and consider how the items we are so accustomed to now may have been
difficult adjustments for those before us!
« February 2007 | Main | April 2007 »
Change is always
difficult.
It can be amusing to look
back and consider how the items we are so accustomed to now may have been
difficult adjustments for those before us!
March 30, 2007 in Change, Culture, Philosophy, Product Development, Publishing & Media | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Book Humor, Change, Content Management, History of the Book, Support, Tech Help
I blog to communicate, to
learn, to write, and to clarify my thoughts.
Even though increasing traffic isn’t my primary goal, blog statistics have been a fun way to gauge
reaction to what I’ve written.
My blog statistics may not
be overly impressive (if you want impressive go look at Technorati’s top 100!), but it has been interesting to watch readership and page views increase at a slow and steady rate over time.
Feedburner tells me how many
subscribers I have.
Technorati
tells me my “rank” as compared to other blogs.
StatCounter gives me both a general view of readership (below) and more detailed statistics.
Currently 60% of my readers are in the US.
I can see from which states, cities, and ISP’s readers have come. I can see my most popular pages, keywords on which people have searched, and visitor activity (which pages they went to, in what order, and on what date).

There are many sites
offering to capture statistics on your blogs, these are just a few.
If you’re interested in
learning more about blogging and building community online, consider attending SOBCon07.
I’m going and I’m sure it
will be an education for all (early registration ends this week).
March 28, 2007 in Blogging | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Blogging, FeedBurner, Liz Strauss, SOBCon, StatCounter, Statistics, Technorati
Bob Sutton is one of my
favorite business authors.
Aside from his belief in
evidence-based management and the value of his work related to organizational
creativity and innovation, I just love this man’s style!
He’s human, readable,
insightful, and direct.
For those of you that aren’t familiar with him, he’s a Professor of Management Science and Engineering in the Stanford Engineering School.
Insights from Bob’s latest
book, The
No Asshole Rule:
What is an asshole?
“… if someone consistently
takes actions that leave a trail of victims in their wake, they deserve to be
branded as certified assholes.”
Attacks are “personal
rather than professional.”
“The difference between
how a person treats the powerless versus the powerful is as good a measure of
human character as I know.”
How do they impact an organization?
“It takes numerous
encounters with positive people to offset the energy and happiness sapped by a
single episode with one asshole.”
People “…devoted their
energy to protecting themselves, not to helping the company.”
“…when people believe that
they work for insensitive jerks, they find ways to get back at them, and
stealing is one of those ways.”
“…how many hours…managers
devote to “asshole management” or to predicting future legal costs incurred by
assholes…”
Then there’s the impact of finger-pointing, risk-adversity, and passive-aggressive behavior that lead to
serious issues with innovation and collaboration.
How can you implement a no asshole rule?
Make a policy of respect
for the individual public and enforce it.
“Hot shots who alienate
colleagues are told to change or leave.”
“…respond immediately if
any individual degrades another…”
“…if persistent nastiness
from any group is left unchecked, it creates a culture of contempt that infects
everyone it touches…”
Assholes multiply. They indirectly encourage people to “kick”
those with less power than themselves. If
in a hiring position, they tend to replicate themselves.
Be careful, your managers
may be assholes: “…even…trivial power advantages can change how people think
and act – and usually for the worse.”
Teach people how to
fight. “…conflict is constructive when
people argue over ideas rather than personality or relationship issues...”
To assess whether you’re
the asshole, learn how to deal with environments where they run rampant, and
explore the (somewhat limited) virtues of having one around, you’ll have to
read the book.
It’s worth it!
March 27, 2007 in Character, Collaboration, Culture, Leadership & Management, Philosophy | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Ann Micheal, Bob Sutton, Business, Change, Culture, Impact of Assholes, Management, No Asshole Rule, Organizational Effectiveness, Review, Robert I Sutton
There’s email etiquette,
phone, interpersonal, cultural, and even blogging etiquette.
How are they the same and
how are they different?
March 26, 2007 in Philosophy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I came home from California and found a book on my desk.
My husband bought it for
me.
I think he’s tired of
answering my
silly questions.
By the way, penguins do
have knees!
I didn’t know that.
March 24, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Ann Michael, David Feldman, Silly Questions
Thank you for your recent
requests for me to renew my subscription. As you know, I’ve been a faithful subscriber for many years.
I find your content
valuable, interesting, and certainly authoritative.
However, that is no longer
enough.
I used to read HBR from
cover to cover every month.
But in the past couple of
years the amount of information finding its way to me has increased
dramatically.
At first, I started to use
the article synopses in the back of your issues to select articles of interest
to me. I would only read those articles
but I still read every word.
As the amount, brevity,
and quality of information I received from multiple sources increased still, I
found myself picking up my HBR less frequently. When I did, I would skim articles, occasionally reading one if it was
immediately applicable to my situation.
As of today, I have not
even picked up an issue in almost a year (other than to move it to my overflowing
bookcase).
I must commend you for
your move to get your articles and full text online. I appreciate it. However, I rarely feel compelled to visit your
site.
The bottom line is that
I’m not getting what I need from you.
If you’d like to keep me
as a customer, here’s what you need to do.
Charge me the full
subscription price you currently charge me.
Do not send me a print
HBR.
Give me unlimited online
access to search and read the full text of all HBR articles past and present.
Enable me to manage my
views of your content according to my interests (I need some tools).
Permit me to download a
set number of full text article pdf’s during my subscription period (I would be
happy with 12).
Charge me, or allow me to
upgrade my subscription, if I want more downloads.
You don’t need to worry
about cannibalization because I’m leaving.
You aren’t cannibalizing
anything. In fact, you might just retain me and attract new subscribers with this model.
Please send me the sign-up
email for this service and I will gladly continue to send you my money.
Thank you.
Ann Michael
As a child, do you
remember being forced to treat adults with respect no matter what?
They didn’t need to
deserve it.
They were older. We were younger.
They could be wrong.
They could be jerks.
It didn’t matter. We had
to bite our tongue.
It made no sense to me.
When I was a little older,
I got a job at a restaurant.
It was the same.
No matter what, the
customer was always right (at least I was getting paid!).
I may have hated being
mistreated or unable to speak my mind, but I learned something about diplomacy.
I learned strategies for
navigating difficult situations from a disadvantageous position.
I didn’t like it, but it
was valuable experience.
I wonder if my kids are
learning that lesson.
March 21, 2007 in Change, Culture, Leadership & Management, Philosophy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Ann Michael, Change, Growing up, Life's Lessons, Respect
Twitter is a 140
character public way to answer the question “What are you doing?”
I was hearing about
Twitter constantly so I decided to check it out.
I registered.
Within an hour someone I didn’t know (but whose blog
I read) added me to their list!
I set Twitter to notify me
through Google Talk if someone in my
network (9 people at the moment) posted anything.
While posting on Twitter
is fun, and can be informative (I got several links to interesting articles and
blog posts), I’m still on the fence.
I’m hoping that if I limit
the group to people I know, or in whose work or specialty I’m interested, that
I might find it useful.
When it comes to Twitter’s
impact on blogging, I
agree with Scott Karp. Twitter won’t
replace blogs, it’s a different kind of communication.
The Wall
Street Journal also had something to say:
“These services elicit
mixed feelings in the technology-savvy people who have been their early
adopters. Fans say they are a good way to keep in touch with busy friends. But
some users are starting to feel "too" connected, as they grapple with
check-in messages at odd hours, higher cellphone bills and the need to tell
acquaintances to stop announcing what they're having for dinner.”
“Twitter's Mr. Dorsey…defended
the site's often prosaic content.
“Everyone says Twitter's
completely useless, I don't want all this information," he said. "We
check in later, and they're complete addicts."”
I’m not
so sure addictions are a good thing. Time will tell.
March 19, 2007 in Blogging, Change, Culture, Product Development, Publishing & Media | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Addictions, Business, Change, Communication, Social Networking, Technology, Tools, Twitter
It's a snowy night.
I'm figuring out how to
use Twitter, learning how to frame
my pictures, and enjoying a nice warm fire.
It's been a long week.
I'm taking the rest of the
night off!
March 16, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
What is balance and how
does one achieve it?
It seems as though balance
(often discussed as an end result) means different things to different people
at different points in their lives.
There are those that
believe balance (some type of loosely defined harmony or optimization) results
when they mix various ingredients (opposites, competing needs, aspirations) in
equal parts (50% X + 50% Y).
Other people define
balance according to some static formula (25% X + 50% Y + 25% Z).
I find these methods
clumsy, limiting, and way too structured!
The proportions change.
The ingredients change.
The desired results
change.
The whole process is
fluid.
The only constant is you.
But not really - because
you’re changing too!
March 14, 2007 in Change, Character, Philosophy | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Ann Michael, Balance, Blending, Constraints, Demands